Re: [ELISA Development Process WG] Proposed new WG
Shuah, we have 2 branched email threads now.toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
See comments and consensus on Philip's suggestion (Linux features for safety-critical systems).
What do you think of that? It is also a combi of 2 and 5.
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...>
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 7:23 PM
To: Elana Copperman <Elana.Copperman@...>; development-process@...; devel@...; Paul Albertella <paul.albertella@...>; Shuah Khan <skhan@...>
Subject: Re: [ELISA Development Process WG] Proposed new WG
On 9/29/21 8:15 AM, elana.copperman@... wrote:
Following today's TSC call and discussion, the new WG proposed in https://docs.google.com/document/d/1557IyH66OlMJHklNg5wceKmJLQgavBUwoYyB2Jib0vU/edit# <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1557IyH66OlMJHklNg5wceKmJLQgavBUwoYyB2Jib0vU/edit#> has been tentatively approved. Thanks to all (especially Lukas and Paul) for your support.I like parts of 2 & 5.
2 as it talks about features and 5 because it includes the Linux kernel features as well as other Linux ecosystem elements that form the platform/basis for the safety critical systems and environments.
The following describes the scope more clearly.
Linux-based components/elements for safety-critical systems
Assuming Linux = Linux kernel in the context. It is clear to me and hope ii will be clear to others (non-ELISA) as well.