Re: Proposed new WG

Jonathan Moore <jandcmoore@...>

The OS will always be SEooC so never in 'full control' of safety.

'Safety related' would be more accurate than 'safety critical' and more in line with the common understanding of the phase.


On Wed, Sep 29, 2021, 6:18 PM Paul Albertella <paul.albertella@...> wrote:
I like Philipp's suggested name best: Linux features for safety-critical


On 2021-09-29 16:38, elana.copperman@... wrote:
> Adding back others (Philipp has some issue with the mailing list - are
> you registered in these groups?)
> From: Ahmann, Philipp (ADITG/ESS1) <pahmann@...>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2021 6:28 PM
> To: jason.smith@...; gpaoloni@...; Elana Copperman
> <Elana.Copperman@...>
> Cc: development-process@...; devel@...; Paul
> Albertella <paul.albertella@...>
> Subject: RE: [ELISA Technical Community] Proposed new WG
> I go for 2.5:
> Linux features for safety-critical systems
> Best regards,
> Philipp

Join to automatically receive all group messages.