Hi Shuah, After a small administrative hiccup, I was able to port my prototype to the ELISA Orientation Repo[1][2] (probably better known as Onboarding - difference being that it should be a repo for

New submission to the ELISA Workshop Fall 2021 CFP. Please find below the details. Email addressgpaoloni@...Primary Speaker InformationPrimary Speaker Full NameGabriele PaoloniPrimary Speaker Job

New submission to the ELISA Workshop Fall 2021 CFP. Please find below the details. Email addressgpaoloni@...Primary Speaker InformationPrimary Speaker Full NameGabriele PaoloniPrimary Speaker Job

New submission to the ELISA Workshop Fall 2021 CFP. Please find below the details. Email addressshaun.mooney@...Primary Speaker InformationPrimary Speaker Full NameShaun MooneyPrimary Speaker Job

New submission to the ELISA Workshop Fall 2021 CFP. Please find below the details. Email addresslukas.bulwahn@...Primary Speaker InformationPrimary Speaker Full NameLukas BulwahnPrimary Speaker Job

See below

Yep. In principal linux, the kernel only, could be a part of an element to the OS and then you could use things like the GNU/Linux distinction but I suspect the OS might be more than just GNU parts. I

Hi Jonathan, As I understand it, this means that Linux could only ever be considered a safety-related *element*, but surely it could still be part of a safety-critical *system*? However, I agree

The OS will always be SEooC so never in 'full control' of safety. 'Safety related' would be more accurate than 'safety critical' and more in line with the common understanding of the phase. J

I am also in favor of #2 "Linux features for safety-critical systems" (long title). Do not be surprised if people shorten it to "Linux features WG" (that does not hurt), on the webpage, for the

Oh my, this is really "fun". But let's converge on a decision. So we are down to 3 choices here: Linux-based components/elements for safety-critical systems Linux features for safety-critical

Dear all, Following today's TSC meeting, a new working group, Open-Source Engineering Process Working Group (OSEP) WG https://lists.elisa.tech/g/osep has been formed. please opt into the OSEP WG

Wow, this turns out to be a fun part. Eveybody can say something about the topic, even without full understanding and still can be right and the winner. TLDR: "Kernel elements" Long

Agreed. But the name is now a bit too long. Any suggestions how to capture this broader view, with a shorter title?

Yeah. Just noticed after sending email. Linux features scopes it to just the Linux kernel. At least that is how I would read it. Is that the intent or is there a need to look at other components? I

Shuah, we have 2 branched email threads now. See comments and consensus on Philip's suggestion (Linux features for safety-critical systems). What do you think of that? It is also a combi of 2 and

Looks good to me too Gab

Hi Elana, I like parts of 2 & 5. 2 as it talks about features and 5 because it includes the Linux kernel features as well as other Linux ecosystem elements that form the platform/basis for the

Agreed. So that unless we get any other comments - for now, we will continue with Philipp's suggestion, "Linux features for safety-critical systems". Thanks to all (Philip, you get the prize. See

I agree and would support this suggested name 100%. Jason