Hi, Elana： We discussed with China Team of TikTok for what we would like to learn. Linux safety Configurations' usage , guarantees and performance tradeoffs. The recommendation for Linux safety

Good points, thanks Wenhui. If you can help to collect more feedback and generate interest from additional practitioners, we can help to build a community within ELISA who can work with the LF on

Thank you all for contributing to the email thread and the discussion during the meeting yesterday. Please review. The following two goals have been identified during the discussion: - Review the

Hi Kate, Shuah, all, Yesterday I listened in on an LF Webinar (here is the recording https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RBVzDGi66aw) which was pretty much a kickoff for the Alpha-Omega Project of LF

As practitioners in industry who uses Linux for the cloud infrastructure, we are very interested in what are the mandatory kernel configurations , and what safety purpose these kernel configurations

Hi all, A point to consider when choosing tasks: perhaps we should define clear criteria, based on potential benefit to the community - and include that message in the introduction or overview. Then

Hi Lukas, Thanks for your reply. I missed the very end of today's meeting (apologies to all for having to drop off the call before it concluded) so I'm not sure if and how much this was discussed

<lukas.bulwahn=gmail.com@...> wrote: Jason, can you mark one artifact of the easy-marked ones as "highest priority and value to you" for us to trigger a new working

Dear all, Once again, we're convening the communities to collaborate virtually during the ELISA Spring 2022 Workshop, taking place April 5-7:

Just a quick assessment: "Easy"(TM, final last words...) --- let us try to present you something here. Difficult. What is a general risk? What is the system? Who needs to address? (I do not know

A quick reply to Lukas prior to our meeting (I apologize, didn't have time to prioritize): We should revisit the work I/we started to do two years ago that never really materialized into anything,

<jason.smith=ul.com@...> wrote: Jason, could you elaborate on your expectation of the small additional pieces of information you see needed as quick wins? Can you put those pieces into a

I agree with these goals. However, I have noticed that in the last three years: - we could not produce a single _published_ result that contains the information from more than two authors

Hi All On my side I am fully supportive of Elana's goals and, WRT to these goals. I think that what Paul pointed out in the email below is the basis to achieve such goals. Thanks Gab

Hi, I support many of the previous suggestions, but would like to add the following goals: 1) Document the working assumptions (and provisional conclusions) that underpin ELISA discussions, to

Reminder: ELISA TSC Meeting (special topic session) When: 02/16/2022 8:00am to 9:00am (UTC-06:00) America/Chicago View Event Description: ELISA Project is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom

Hello Shuah, all, although, I have a customer meeting during the first half ofthe TSC and can onlyjoin later,I would like to contribute my goal/success ideasg forthe year. I believe they also fit

I think I am aligned with Elena's goals. We have been working towards Goal 1 in the Automotive WG, but progress is slow, especially given the fact that a number of participants have dropped out or

I stand corrected. Perhaps more accurate: Those who are "ok with Linux as is", believe that theydon't really need any by-products of ELISA. They will continue to do what they are already

Hi Elana, Just wanted to respond to one of your comments: Those who are "ok with Linux as is", don't really need any by-products of ELISA. They will continue to do what they are already