This group is locked. No changes can be made to the group while it is locked.
Re: "Pseudo-DIA" between the Linux Kernel Development Community and its Users
|
John MacGregor <john.macgregor@...>
Hi Lukas,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Most other safety standards (that I deal with at least) don't address the specific problem areas of volume manufacturers who rely on suppliers to supply and/or develop parts of their safety-critical systems. A significant part of the group also doesn't have that background either. That's why I sent the email with the links before the telco. Simply understanding how a DIA works in a normal supply chain (i.e. without open source) might be a good first step. I mean which divisions of labour (and responsibility) are possible and what the obligations and responsibilities would be for both customer and supplier to achieve a seamless chain of evidence sufficient to satisfy a safety case might be a good first step (although, given my obvious bias, I might also say qualifying for QM rather than satisfying a safety case ;-) ) Cheers John BTW, if you post the document on the ELISA Tech Google Drive, we could put our comments there as well. Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards John MacGregor Safety, Security and Privacy (CR/AEX4) Robert Bosch GmbH | Postfach 10 60 50 | 70049 Stuttgart | GERMANY | www.bosch.com Tel. +49 711 811-42995 | Mobil +49 151 543 09433 | John.MacGregor@... Sitz: Stuttgart, Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 14000; Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender: Franz Fehrenbach; Geschäftsführung: Dr. Volkmar Denner, Prof. Dr. Stefan Asenkerschbaumer, Dr. Michael Bolle, Dr. Christian Fischer, Dr. Stefan Hartung, Dr. Markus Heyn, Harald Kröger, Christoph Kübel, Rolf Najork, Uwe Raschke, Peter Tyroller -----Original Message----- |