Regarding the “template of a suitable Pseudo-DIA”, I think we need to ensure that Jochen’s columns (“the template”) covers my five points:
a. a specification of the scope, i.e., the development of an item or element
b. a definition of two parties involved in the development of that scope
c. description of activities
d. assignment of activities to each party,
e. evidences that the assignment meets the actual reality of executed activities among the two parties
f. description of resulting evidence or work products that need to be created by one party and provided as input to the other party for further activity.
I believe a. and b. can be generally covered and does not need a further column.
From my memory on Management Aspects, one proposal could be to split:
“Observed Execution of Linux Kernel” can be split into “Activity executed by Linux Kernel Development Community”; “Evidences from that execution”; “Activity needed to be covered by the
User”; “Interface (artefacts) between Community and User”.
I think we need to agree on suitable column names for that and we could then adjust the tables accordingly. Jochen, Kate and I can try to figure this out for the Management Aspects.