|
Re: Correction Safety Architecture WG Minutes WW19.2
Thanks for the fix Chris.
BTW I encourage also other people to fix the notes if they notice something to be not properly captured.
As also discussed in the meeting let’s continue the
Thanks for the fix Chris.
BTW I encourage also other people to fix the notes if they notice something to be not properly captured.
As also discussed in the meeting let’s continue the
|
By
Paoloni, Gabriele <gabriele.paoloni@...>
·
#512
·
|
|
Correction Safety Architecture WG Minutes WW19.2
Dear colleagues,
John just brought to my attention that my comments at the end of yesterday’s meeting may not have been captured correctly.
Pursuing this lead I corrected the meeting minutes
Dear colleagues,
John just brought to my attention that my comments at the end of yesterday’s meeting may not have been captured correctly.
Pursuing this lead I corrected the meeting minutes
|
By
Christopher Temple
·
#511
·
|
|
Cancelled Event: ELISA Safety-Architecture Weekly Meeting - Tuesday, 18 May 2021
#cal-cancelled
Cancelled: ELISA Safety-Architecture Weekly Meeting
This event has been cancelled.
When:
Tuesday, 18 May 2021
12:00pm to 1:00pm
(UTC+00:00)
Cancelled: ELISA Safety-Architecture Weekly Meeting
This event has been cancelled.
When:
Tuesday, 18 May 2021
12:00pm to 1:00pm
(UTC+00:00)
|
By
safety-architecture@lists.elisa.tech Calendar <noreply@...>
·
#510
·
|
|
ww20 agenda
Hi All
I have the following topics for tomorrow:
Call-tree-tool introduction (Eli)
Hybrid mode qualification flow: moving it to the development process wg?
Telltale kernel requirements, sw
Hi All
I have the following topics for tomorrow:
Call-tree-tool introduction (Eli)
Hybrid mode qualification flow: moving it to the development process wg?
Telltale kernel requirements, sw
|
By
Paoloni, Gabriele <gabriele.paoloni@...>
·
#509
·
|
|
ELISA Safety-Architecture Weekly Meeting - Tue, 05/11/2021 12:00pm-1:00pm
#cal-reminder
Reminder: ELISA Safety-Architecture Weekly Meeting
When: Tuesday, 11 May 2021, 12:00pm to 1:00pm, (GMT+00:00)
Reminder: ELISA Safety-Architecture Weekly Meeting
When: Tuesday, 11 May 2021, 12:00pm to 1:00pm, (GMT+00:00)
|
By
safety-architecture@lists.elisa.tech Calendar <safety-architecture@...>
·
#508
·
|
|
Re: [ELISA Technical Community] [ELISA Safety Architecture WG] What’s in a name?
I'm booked solid on Wednesday, so I'd prefer after the workshop.
I'm booked solid on Wednesday, so I'd prefer after the workshop.
|
By
John MacGregor
·
#507
·
|
|
Re: [ELISA Technical Community] [ELISA Safety Architecture WG] What’s in a name?
Hi,
Good point. I'm happy to have a kick-off on Wednesday instead, or alternatively we can schedule something for after the Workshop.
Regards,
Paul
Hi,
Good point. I'm happy to have a kick-off on Wednesday instead, or alternatively we can schedule something for after the Workshop.
Regards,
Paul
|
By
Paul Albertella
·
#506
·
|
|
Re: [ELISA Technical Community] [ELISA Safety Architecture WG] What’s in a name?
Hi Paul
I'm in for a call after the Dev Proc WG session. Others may not be although, as Thursday is Ascension Day in Germany and it's one of the few opportunities to have a 4 day weekend by taking
Hi Paul
I'm in for a call after the Dev Proc WG session. Others may not be although, as Thursday is Ascension Day in Germany and it's one of the few opportunities to have a 4 day weekend by taking
|
By
John MacGregor
·
#505
·
|
|
Re: [ELISA Technical Community] [ELISA Safety Architecture WG] What’s in a name?
Hi,
This is a tweaked repost of https://lists.elisa.tech/g/safety-architecture/message/503 to a wider audience, as I inadvertently replied to the Safety Architecture WG only.
I agree that we need a
Hi,
This is a tweaked repost of https://lists.elisa.tech/g/safety-architecture/message/503 to a wider audience, as I inadvertently replied to the Safety Architecture WG only.
I agree that we need a
|
By
Paul Albertella
·
#504
·
|
|
Re: [ELISA Technical Community] [ELISA Safety Architecture WG] What’s in a name?
Hi John,
I agree that we need a document (or set of documents) to articulate a common model for this, which can be used to describe the various different approaches to system development that could
Hi John,
I agree that we need a document (or set of documents) to articulate a common model for this, which can be used to describe the various different approaches to system development that could
|
By
Paul Albertella
·
#503
·
|
|
Re: [ELISA Technical Community] [ELISA Safety Architecture WG] What’s in a name?
--------------------------------------
Error: I misread the spec and Part 6 Clause 7 has the System Architecture Design, not the Software Architecture Design as input. The process in that clause is
--------------------------------------
Error: I misread the spec and Part 6 Clause 7 has the System Architecture Design, not the Software Architecture Design as input. The process in that clause is
|
By
John MacGregor
·
#502
·
|
|
call-tree tool
Hi all
As discussed in the last WG session the call-tree tool is now released here:
https://github.com/elisa-tech/Safety_Architecture_WG/tree/master/call_tree_tool
Feel free to try it and
Hi all
As discussed in the last WG session the call-tree tool is now released here:
https://github.com/elisa-tech/Safety_Architecture_WG/tree/master/call_tree_tool
Feel free to try it and
|
By
Paoloni, Gabriele <gabriele.paoloni@...>
·
#501
·
|
|
Re: [ELISA Technical Community] [ELISA Safety Architecture WG] What’s in a name?
Hi,
ISO 26262-6 7.2 (General) states:
"The software architectural design represents the software architectural elements and their interactions in a hierarchical structure. Static aspects, such as
Hi,
ISO 26262-6 7.2 (General) states:
"The software architectural design represents the software architectural elements and their interactions in a hierarchical structure. Static aspects, such as
|
By
Oscar Slotosch
·
#500
·
|
|
Re: [ELISA Technical Community] [ELISA Safety Architecture WG] What’s in a name?
Hi
I'm not sure either, but 26262 is not explicit enough. Back to my original comment that this goes beyond nomenclature. We should also keep in mind that we're not _just_ talking about 26262. I'm
Hi
I'm not sure either, but 26262 is not explicit enough. Back to my original comment that this goes beyond nomenclature. We should also keep in mind that we're not _just_ talking about 26262. I'm
|
By
John MacGregor
·
#499
·
|
|
Re: [ELISA Technical Community] [ELISA Safety Architecture WG] What’s in a name?
Hi John
By
Paoloni, Gabriele <gabriele.paoloni@...>
·
#498
·
|
|
Re: [ELISA Technical Community] [ELISA Safety Architecture WG] What’s in a name?
Hi
At least I now have a framework to explain what's bugging me (Thanks Chris).
To Elana's question:
Referring to the conceptual model of an architectural description[1] which was linked in Chris'
Hi
At least I now have a framework to explain what's bugging me (Thanks Chris).
To Elana's question:
Referring to the conceptual model of an architectural description[1] which was linked in Chris'
|
By
John MacGregor
·
#497
·
|
|
Re: [ELISA Technical Community] [ELISA Safety Architecture WG] What’s in a name?
Hi Elana
I would like first to clarify the name "architecture" while it is used in the current
discussions that we are having about the hybrid mode.
Then we can see if we need to revisit the WG
Hi Elana
I would like first to clarify the name "architecture" while it is used in the current
discussions that we are having about the hybrid mode.
Then we can see if we need to revisit the WG
|
By
Paoloni, Gabriele <gabriele.paoloni@...>
·
#496
·
|
|
Re: [ELISA Technical Community] [ELISA Safety Architecture WG] What’s in a name?
Gab, now I am confused.
Isn't it safety architecture? This also matches the WG name, as well as the definitions below.
Regards
Elana
Gab, now I am confused.
Isn't it safety architecture? This also matches the WG name, as well as the definitions below.
Regards
Elana
|
By
Elana C
·
#495
·
|
|
Re: [ELISA Technical Community] [ELISA Safety Architecture WG] What’s in a name?
Hi guys
WRT the discussions that we are having right now about the hybrid
mode I think that the best nomenclature would be "SW Architecture"
or "SW Architecture Design" and to disambiguate we could
Hi guys
WRT the discussions that we are having right now about the hybrid
mode I think that the best nomenclature would be "SW Architecture"
or "SW Architecture Design" and to disambiguate we could
|
By
Paoloni, Gabriele <gabriele.paoloni@...>
·
#494
·
|
|
Re: [ELISA Technical Community] [ELISA Safety Architecture WG] What’s in a name?
Hi Chris
The referenced definition is great - in-depth, with a discussion of the different perceptions of the term "architecture" and then again not too long. It addresses my concern that the
Hi Chris
The referenced definition is great - in-depth, with a discussion of the different perceptions of the term "architecture" and then again not too long. It addresses my concern that the
|
By
John MacGregor
·
#493
·
|