Hi guys Due to my job transition (and other private tasks) I am not able to host next week meeting. If anybody wants to do so please let me know. Thanks Gab -------------------------------------------

Hi All Since I am leaving Intel soon I had to do remove the current directories and do a new upload of all the WG material (I could not change ownership of the files). The material itself and the dire

Hi all For today I have the following topic: Modifying CallTree to resolve Macros (StefanoD) Cotinuation of the re-evaluation of the FS and watchdog subsystem FMEAs in the context of the Telltale use

Dear participants of the safety architecture WG I am writing to inform you that I am leaving Intel to join a new adventure with Red Hat. Following my transition I expect no changes in the Safety Archi

Hi Paul Thanks ofr raising this

Hi All For today I’d continue with the in-context safety measures to control the failure modes deriving from the Telltale Kernel Safety Analysis Thanks Gab --------------------------------------------

Hi All Tomorrow we’ll revisit the telltale safety analysis (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-qfyfWJasfXc3IES7RUtfnnxkVsKkOkl/edit#gid=459221992) tailored to the telltale context. I have added

Hi John Sorry to come back late on this...for some reason I missed it

Hi All Following the email below I didn’t get any volunteer to chair, so the meeting for today is cancelled. Regards Gab

Hi Lukas

Hi All I just realized that I have booked vacation for next week from Mon to Wed inclusive. So I will not be able to chair the Safety Arch WG meeting. Please let me know if anybody want to chair, othe

Hi Lukas

Hi Yujue I used the indentantion that is usually used by Linux mailing list. BTW I am replying inline (GP) hoping that it is ok for you. Many thanks Gab

Hi YuJue

Hi YuJue From my side I agree with the opinion from Roberto. WRT your statement I think any formal safety review will not accept the "hybrid approach" you introduced. This is like two 10-year-old girl

Hi QianChunlei WRT table6 it is something that we need to discuss (it may happen in the development process WG sometime); my idea is to avoid enforcing it as part8.12 is used to qualify the “SW Units”

Hi All Proposed agenda for tomorrow: Opens and Feedbacks from the Workshop Telltale kernel requirements, sw architectures and safety analyses Thanks Gab -----------------------------------------------

Thanks for the fix Chris. BTW I encourage also other people to fix the notes if they notice something to be not properly captured. As also discussed in the meeting let’s continue the discussion about

Hi All I have the following topics for tomorrow: Call-tree-tool introduction (Eli) Hybrid mode qualification flow: moving it to the development process wg? Telltale kernel requirements, sw architectur