Correction Safety Architecture WG Minutes WW19.2
|
Christopher Temple
Dear colleagues,
John just brought to my attention that my comments at the end of yesterday’s meeting may not have been captured correctly.
Pursuing this lead I corrected the meeting minutes on Google to reflect the comment made.
As captured: Chris: Mistake to think that conformance to the standard does not equate to safety A loophole in the standard should not be an opportunity, but something that needs to be fixed The kind of model that has been created so far may not be sufficiently high granularity to identify hazards
Corrected: Chris: Mistake to think that conformance to the standard automatically equates to safety A loophole in the standard should not be something to exploit, but something that needs to be fixed The kind of model that has been created so far may not be sufficient to identify significant critical failure modes
Best regards Chris ----------------------------------------
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Paoloni, Gabriele <gabriele.paoloni@...>
Thanks for the fix Chris.
BTW I encourage also other people to fix the notes if they notice something to be not properly captured.
As also discussed in the meeting let’s continue the discussion about the suitability of the hybrid mode flow in the development process wg.
Gab
From: safety-architecture@... <safety-architecture@...>
On Behalf Of Christopher Temple
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2021 11:44 PM To: safety-architecture@... Subject: [ELISA Safety Architecture WG] Correction Safety Architecture WG Minutes WW19.2
Dear colleagues,
John just brought to my attention that my comments at the end of yesterday’s meeting may not have been captured correctly.
Pursuing this lead I corrected the meeting minutes on Google to reflect the comment made.
As captured: Chris: Mistake to think that conformance to the standard does not equate to safety A loophole in the standard should not be an opportunity, but something that needs to be fixed The kind of model that has been created so far may not be sufficiently high granularity to identify hazards
Corrected: Chris: Mistake to think that conformance to the standard automatically equates to safety A loophole in the standard should not be something to exploit, but something that needs to be fixed The kind of model that has been created so far may not be sufficient to identify significant critical failure modes
Best regards Chris ----------------------------------------
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you. --------------------------------------------------------------------- This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for |
||||
|
|
